Levonius destroys countless children's lives via undeniably illegal orders.
A plethora of ironclad documentation (ex: appellate decisions) confirms Levonius habitually issues patently illegal orders.
Re: PICTURE Please read about the crimes (literally crimes) Levonius has committed against me and many others - and infinitely worse committed to KNOWINGLY emotionally harm & greatly physically endanger our children - before deciding if the symbol on her forehead is justified. I know it's hard for those on the outside looking in to believe she's as corrupt & otherwise evil as we claim, but a mountain of rock solid evidence proves we're not lying about or exaggerating one damned thing. Levonius on a very regular basis issues orders that literally plain as day violate state law, the U.S. & Texas Constitutions, and/or binding precedent (sometimes all four). *****Levonius has 100x over clearly proven her levels of corruption, megalomania, depravity, sexism, idiocy, child cruelty/endangerment, and GROSS family, civil, and misdemeanor law incompetence are ALL at a jaw-dropping level. ***Yes, she's just as big of nut job as the look on her face in pic indicates.
Jury trial is the only viable option.
Please see the last section of this website to learn why being male and in a custody battle with Levonius assigned as the judge means you must choose jury trial – and why it’s inexcusable if your current attorney has advised against jury trial or outright hidden that option from you. There is no client-friendly reason for a family law attorney representing a male client in Levonius’s court to advise allowing Levonius to 100% unilaterally decide every single matter.
*****APPELLATE COURT RULINGS VERIFYING LEVONIUS IS CORRUPT AND INCOMPETENT TO THE EXTRTEME. To read just a few of the many decisions in which the 2nd Court of Appeals threw out Levonius's obviously illegal orders, please scroll to the page far below that begins with big red lettering "Examples of Levonius's illegal orders overturned on appeal."
- *My case is now on appeal.
To cut to the chase to see just what all soulless Levonius has illegally done to me and my son, please review my now former attorney’s reconsideration motion posted in the .pdf section. That attorney pulled no punches. (I’m leaving her anonymous to lessen the chances of Levonius and/or her goons going after her).
Summary of Judge Crystal Levonius’s colossal level of corruption. Ever before heard of a judge ordering the WINNER of a trial (jury or bench) pay the other side’s legal fees?
A jury, including a retired pediatrician, declared me to be the winner of the trial. They chose for my ex and me to continue with the same exact 50/50 custody with equal parental rights (joint managing conservatorship with neither home being deemed my son’s primary residence). 50/50 with equal rights across the board was what was in place for our son’s first 11 years of life.
(50/50 with equal rights is all my attorney and I requested). My ex despicably shot for sole custody in the belief the jury would buy her and her attorney’s incessant, insidious defamation.
Five weeks after the jury trial, Levonius in her “rendition” violated the hell out of the law by claiming it’s her “right” and “it’s justified” to give my ex 85% of custody, make ALL of the decisions on our son’s life (I have no say on anything despite being a joint conservator), I pay child support, and even though I was the WINNER of the trial (and I’m not the one who filed this insanity, and my ex refused to abide by the mediation order), Levonius ordered me to pay $155,000 in my ex’s legal fees! And to prove she’s just as incompetent and gullible as she is corrupt, Levonius ordered I pay one massive monthly bill (over $2200) for child support and legal fees combined! Mega-incompetent Levonius openly asked if combining those fees is permissible and pathological liar opposing counsel, Lene DeRudder, told her it is. Combining child support and legal fees into a lump sum to be paid off monthly has been illegal since a 2013 Texas Supreme Court ruling! Too bad for those soulless goons (Levonius and DeRudder) that my then attorney got the combined fees crap thrown out a few months later.
Please know that not a single witness claimed I’m an unfit father. To the contrary, a neighbor, a teacher, and my son’s court-appointed counselor of the preceding 20 months said I’m a good father! The very highly regarded counselor, Ellen Hutton LPC (who had been a longtime custody evaluator), highly recommended custody stay at or near 50/50!
Please see important 9/4/2025 update far below (in another section) regarding Levonius’s quite possibly favorite accomplice Lene DeRudder’s “brilliant” recent actions. Just search on this site for “9/4/2025” or scroll down to the page I titled “More on defamation-addicted, fake orders-creating opposing counsel Lene DeRudder." Also read about "great attorney" DeRudder inexplicably denying my ex a GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY by refusing my former attorney's request for the trial to be changed from jury to bench (“bench” means the judge decides everything).
For the family law cases that aren’t settled and thus a trial is necessary, 95% entail a bench trial.
***Please do a keyword search of this website for “ASPD” to read additional facts about morally bankrupt, highly disturbed megalomaniac Levonius.
ASPD: ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER
PLEA
Please keep in mind that colossally corrupt individuals such as Levonius, her Collin County connections good buddy opposing counsel Lene DeRudder, and other highly unethical people count on people on the outside looking in quickly believing there’s “no way” their corruption is anywhere close to as commonplace, egregious, or blatant as “insignificant” people such as myself claim it to be. If you would, please review at least some of the evidence I’ve provided on this website (such as in the pdf’s section) - evidence that includes Levonius repeatedly violating no room for misinterpretation state laws - before drawing a conclusion on the accuracy of the claims I’ve made against her and her accomplices. Thank you.
LEVONIUS’S CRIMES (to name a few)
Crystal Levonius is undeniably guilty of illegally contravening a jury's BINDING decisions, blackmail, and condoning child abuse and endangerment. Condoning by doing nothing about the abuse (even when rock solid evidence of it is stuck in her face) SOLELY because the perpetrator is one of her fellow females. Please read the details below.
Levonius also literally had no problem with it when informed of opposing counsel Lene DeRudder going behind her back to make up her own “order” and use it to repeatedly threaten to steal my son from me if I didn't abide by it! Levonius also had no problem with DeRudder claiming to a court coordinator that she (DeRudder) won an important hearing that in fact had yet to even be scheduled, much less held – and had no problem with DeRudder gravely defaming me in open court (Levonius shockingly admitted she realized the sick allegation was untrue). The transcripts and much other evidence undeniably prove Levonius over and over again gave DeRudder a free pass to be just as unethical as she wished to be.
CONTACT INFO
Please contact me, Tom Purcell, at 817-999-9226 or via this website's messaging system if your family or one you know has ever been a victim of Levonius's countless acts of judicial misconduct. Crimes she has undeniably committed during the 3.5 years her conscienceless and incompetent to the extreme sorry ass has infested the Denton County bench. Yes, blatantly criminal-level, not just “run of the mill” judicial misconduct. (again, see .pdf's below for details). Thank you.
Levonius simply has no shame. She’s every bit as heinous, conniving, disturbed, and damaging to children as the pedophiles she used to prosecute!
FAMILY CODE 105.002(c)(1)(D):
“(c) In a jury trial: (1) a party is entitled to a verdict by the jury and the court may not contravene a jury verdict on the issue of… (D) the determination of which joint managing conservator has the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child."
CONTINUED..
Why did Levonius illegally give jurors the option to skip out on doing their legal duty to either designate my house or my ex’s house as our son’s primary residence? It’s very simple. Levonius knew that if she had not tricked them out of choosing a primary residence then they would have NO DOUBT chosen my house as the primary. How did sexist to the extreme Levonius know they would have chosen me as the primary? Because she knew jurors had heard several witnesses testify on what makes me a good dad, and how close my then 11yr old son and I have always been since his birth, and that I have always had 50/50 custody since his birth with equal rights across the board -- thus she knew jurors were absolutely disgusted by my ex shooting for sole custody! Jurors’ facial expressions made clear they were in fact thoroughly disgusted with my ex, and her defamation-addicted and otherwise patently immoral attorney, Lene DeRudder, actually trying to make them (jurors) believe it would be in my son’s best interests for me to be suddenly and completely stripped out of his life! (My ex and her attorney had in their pleading that the jury should award my ex sole custody).
My ex shot for sole custody because:
1) she doesn’t care that it’s vital for our son’s self-esteem and general well-being for his loving father to continue being a major part of his life for the rest of his childhood (not just birth thru age 11), 2) she and her attorney thought I’d have no attorney representing me at trial.
RESULTS OF LEVONIUS'S CRIMES
***Thanks to Levonius’s numerous criminal acts (yes, criminal acts, not just “run of the mill” judicial misconduct), I went from having my son a little over 50% of the time w/ equal rights across the board from the time he was born until age 11 to being token dad with an average of five days a month possession.
BLACKMAIL
The blackmail is in regards to Levonius making me her proxy to recruit counselors to unbeknownst to them be complicit in Levonius’s clearly illegal in literally ten-plus ways, YEARS LONG order for me to indefinitely attend counseling -- no criminal record, no history of violence, no history of threats, no history of substance abuse, no CPS involvement me, and no expert witness claiming I need counseling. (The counseling statutes Levonius horrendously violated, and continues to violate, are stated within my SCJC complaint attached below). It's blackmail because if I don’t do said recruiting then she will "immediately terminate my possession... until the next period of possession.” (That’s quoted from final orders). Sociopathic, megalomaniac Levonius has illegally made me attend over 125 counseling sessions (and counting) in the last 37 months! Levonius herself made it obvious from day 1 that I don't actually need counseling because she never stated what alleged mental health condition(s) she ILLEGALLY AND UNILATERALLY "diagnosed," never set any topics to be addressed or "goals,", and has never required the counselor to provide any sort of update on my "progress." In other words, the counseling was ordered solely to torment me (i.e. for Levonius to get a power-trip) because: 1) I'm male, 2) I complain "too much"....such as "commit harassment" when criticizing my ex for doing things such as REPEATEDLY sending me OFW messages threatening to steal an entire week of my possession time if I don't abide by a "court order" that she and her rotten attorney completely fabricated.
***Please see below in the string of pdf's my current counselor’s (counselor of the last 6.5 months) statement to the court in which she declares I don’t need counseling, no sign I’ve ever needed it, unabashedly rips Levonius over her counseling order being blatantly illegal in several ways, and quotes her code of ethics regarding no counselor should continue counseling anyone they know doesn't need counseling but is illegally forced to attend. My current counselor is everything Levonius is not: honest, objective, sane, law-abiding, humble, competent, and cares about my son's well-being!
*****FOR 3.5 YEARS DENTON’S OTHER JUDGES, THE TEXAS RANGERS, THE DENTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, THE DENTON CO. GOP AND THE STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT HAVE ALL COWARDLY, CRUELLY, ILLEGALLY, AND CONTINUOUSLY LOOKED THE OTHER WAY DESPITE LEVONIUS 100X OVER AND VERY OPENLY PROVING HERSELF TO BE MEGA-CORRUPT AT ENORMOUS EMOTIONAL, FINANCIAL, AND EVEN OFTEN PHSYCIAL COST TO HUNDREDS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE SINCE SPRING 2022 (VERY MUCH INCLUDING CHILDREN). Neither Judge McFarling or Judge Shanklin or any other SELF-PROCLALIMED "HONORABLE" Denton judge has found enough decency or balls to even anonymously report Levonius's colossal level of judicial misconduct to the media. With multiple children and innocent adults being hurt by Levonius's evil just about EVERY WEEK of about 48 weeks out of EVERY year, the number of innocent people having their lives destroyed by Levonius makes those other judges and all the other entities mentioned above choosing to do nothing EVERY BIT as despicable and culpable as if they were into their fourth year of hiding having witnessed multiple children being murdered! Every Denton judge staying silent is a cowardly disgrace to every honorable member of their family, both alive and deceased.
MORE ON MY STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT (SCJC) COMPLAINT VS LEVONIUS.
The wording of my below SCJC complaint vs Levonius only entails about 5.5 pages.. Rest of the complaint pages consist of: A) the quoting of the statutes Levonius blatantly and horrendously violated at great emotional and financial expense to me and my then 11yr old son, B) more documentation verifying Levonius is addicted to violating the law in order to oppress and damage the hell out of innocent people to feed her insatiable God complex and sexism addiction.
CLUELESS LEVONIUS
Levous IN FACT over and over again proves herself to be grossly incompetent and yet she’s somehow arrogant as hell -- actually believes the Denton County legal community highly respects her when IN FACT they totally disrespect her -- see her as being what she so obviously is: a total disgrace due to her outrageous level of bias, believing ALL her stupid as hell assumptions are "totally correct," making obviously illegal rulings left and right, and being an outright laughingstock due to her literally monumental level of incompetence in family law, civil law, and misdemeanor law.
***There is no excuse for Denton County's officials and the Denton County GOP doing nothing to protect us or our children from the clear and ever-present evil that is Crystal Levonius.
Get COLLIN COUNTY Levonius’s morally bankrupt, deranged as hell sorry ass out of our county!
-------> TO READ ABOUT LEVONIUS AND ASPD (ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER), PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF THIS WEBSITE.
***FAMOUS QUOTE THAT IN A WAY IS VERY APPLICABLE TO ALL THOSE WHO HOLD A POSITION OF POWER WHO KNOW OF LEVONIUS’S SKY-HIGH LEVELS OF CORRUPTION AND INCOMPETENCE AND COULD EXPOSE AND STOP HER, BUT COWARDLY AND DESTRUCTIVELY SIT BACK DOING NOTHING.
"The only thing necessary for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing." I actually don't like that quote -- because regardless of whether the matter is incessant, years-long felony-level judicial misconduct that inherently emotionally destroys kids or seeing a neighbor beat his kid, the fact is any person (McFarling, Shanklin, Kristin Anderson (Levonius's court reporter, or other) choosing to stay silent while possessing the knowledge and power to alleviate the suffering of children and/or prevent their future suffering, is obviously not a good person.
LEVONIUS HAVING NO PROBLEM WITH A CHILD BEING SUBJECTED TO THE EVIL THAT IS MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME BY PROXY (subjected for at least eight months!) -- ***NO PROBLEM BECAUSE THE PERPETRATOR IS FEMALE.
I have read and heard (recording) much evidence of Levonius undeniably having no problem with a female family law litigant exhibiting Munchausen’s by proxy (over a period of at least eight months) when speaking with both the child’s doctor and a custody evaluator. When the time is right, I will provide many more details about this, including name the culprit. The culprit, after the child’s lifelong doctor didn’t buy her heinous lies, admitted (on tape) that she had completely made up that her child is psychotic, pulls his hair out, creates bald spots. Proof of Levonius being just fine with said by definition child abuse is that she did absolutely nothing during a TRO hearing when provided rock solid evidence of all the above – nothing to protect the child and didn’t at all scold the mother! Why would she? I mean the accused was the child’s mother, not father, so regardless of how much damage and endangerment the child suffered, Levonius no doubt instantly decided (upon receiving the TRO app) to do absolutely nothing to protect the child.
***Mayo Clinic’s definition for Munchausen’s by proxy: "Factitious disorder imposed on another, previously called Munchausen syndrome by proxy, is when someone falsely claims that another person has physical or mental symptoms of illness or causes injury or disease in another person to deceive others." "This form of abuse can put a child in danger of being hurt or getting medical care that isn't needed."
Can you imagine a judge so blatantly showing she doesn’t care about a child’s well-being that she does nothing, not even scold the culprit, after being shown a mountain of rock solid evidence of a parent undeniably committing committing the above act? Obviously because the mom exhibited the Munchausen’s by proxy, not the dad, sexist to the extreme Levonius would NEVER do anything to protect the child – not even if the culprit had gotten a doctor to believe her “my child is psychotic and rage-filled" patently false narrative and thus prescribed powerful meds to which the child had horrible side effects that caused him or her to be hospitalized!
***2nd pic above:
shows the results of this website's first two months of existence (4/12 - 6/12/2025): 1001 unique site visitors.
Not all that great, but not too bad and definitely a lot more than Levonius was guessing. Thank you to everyone who’s viewed my website and suggested to others that they take a look too!
CONTINUED..
1001 is definitely several hundred more viewers than Levonius and her goons were expecting. I can just imagine Miss Crystal at some fancy luncheon back in late April (shortly after I launched website and picketed with one other person) and one of her fellow morally bankrupt, oppression-addicted snobs telling her something to the effect of “Oh sweet Crystal dear, it will be alright. Only a few dozen will ever bother reading that ‘nut’s’ website; he will fade away for good in 2-3 months tops. He will not affect your standing or your reputation one little bit.” FACTS: 1001 (actually 1081 as of 6/22/2025) is a lot more than a few dozen, I’m not a nut, I will not be fading away, and my reporting of the facts that prove Levonius is just as NUTTY and incompetent as she is corrupt have made her even more of a laughingstock/disgrace in the eyes of the Denton County legal community -- per comments several attorneys made to me while I was picketing in front of the Denton courthouse over the course of four days.
How many attorneys gave me anywhere from a little to a lot of encouragement while I was picketing? At least eight. How many were mad about the fact I was disseminating about their “sweet” Crystal? One, a jerk who mumbled his name when I asked him for it and then said “Yes” to my request for a business card -- and then pretended to not be able to find one! What attorney goes to the courthouse without either his big case on wheels or his wallet having a single business card? I told him “Nice job pretending you don’t have one.” He had no response to that.
LEVONIUS AS A COLLIN COUNTY ADA
Because of the numerous highly immoral, blatantly illegal acts Levonius has overtly committed ever since first infesting Denton County's bench 3.5 years ago, I think it’s a safe bet that while she was an ADA in Collin Co. she hid exculpatory evidence. After all, Levonius has such a sociopathic mind that she sees no problem with imprisoning innocent people (which she has already done) just to get a power-trip and tell the community she took another “bad guy” off the streets. Levonius has many times over proved her level of corruption and her God complex are in FACT at a second to none level.
SOME OF LEVONIUS’S UNIMAGINABLE (UNHEARD OF) AND IN MANY CASES ILLEGAL RULINGS
A month post-jury verdict, Levonius gave my son’s mother an average of 25 days a month custody, the right to unilaterally make all medical and educational decisions, receive child support -- and despite that I WON the jury trial and my ex was the one who filed the suit (and even though she ignored the order to attend mediation), soulless sexist pig Levonius ordered me to pay over $155,400 in my ex's legal fees! Money I of course don't have! In Levonius's depraved mind, I was to immediately after suit filed FIVE YEARS EARLIER give my ex all the possession and other custody rights she wanted, not dare exercise my right to fight back in court. A judge making either side pay legal fees after a custody battle is exceedingly rare (under 4%) -- and literally unheard of when the one ordered to pay fees WON the trial, was NOT the one who filed suit, and was NOT the parent who refused to abide by the STANDARD order for the parties to try to come to an agreement via mediation!
A plethora of facts prove Levonius’s addiction to abusing her position knows no bounds.
Levonius's megalomania is so extreme that if a 30-0 jury vote were possible and did occur she would NO DOUBT want to spit in the face of each juror if Miss Crystal "knew for sure" they made the wrong decisions.
She is just that sick.
OUTRIGHT ATROCITIES COMMITTED BY LEVONIUS AGAINST ANOTHER FATHER AND HIS KIDS.
A completely different "page" below (not part of this very long section’s wording) discusses the truly depraved acts Levonius perpetrated against Mark Loyd and his young sons, including 60 days jail time (CRAZY!) and a $10,000 fine for Mark, and 11 months of not seeing his sons! You will be shocked at the level of hell Levonius has put and is putting Mark and his kids through over Mark doing something normal judges find COMPLETELY petty. Normal judges: those who aren’t mega-corrupt, or unfathomably incompetent, or mega-delusional, or mega-sexist, or raging with megalomania, or a total prude. Levonius has hundreds of times over proven herself guilty of meeting all six said descriptors to the absolute max.
LENE DERUDDER
Also below is a "page" I created exclusively for opposing counsel "I'll fabricate any orders I wish to 'justify' my repeatedly threatening to steal someone's child and knowingly defame any opposing litigant I wish in open court" Lene DeRudder. Please note there is also much info on DeRudder on this page.
LEVONIUS'S VERY BAD ACTING
If you're ever in Levonius’s courtroom (481st Denton) for any reason, please don’t buy into her very bad acting. I’m referring to her trying to seem “so nice and wanting fairness for everyone” when for minutes straight she talks with an obviously feigned calm and “sweet” voice. What she has done in my case and in many other cases, including never proves Levonius is an openly biased to hell beast who perpetually ignores heinous facts about the opposing (female) litigant while literally making up "facts" about the male. In the process Levonius ignores (VIOLATES) numerous no room for misinterpretation statutes and binding precedent and instead imposes her own “laws” based on her outrageous biases and "intuition" and assumptions, most of which are obviously asinine (obvious to non-psychotic people anyway).
LEVONIUS SHAMELESSLY OOZING MALFEASANCE.
She worries little or not at all about being held accountable for any of the gross judicial misconduct she perpetually commits because she fully believes Abbott being the one who dumped her (appointed her) morally bankrupt, ZERO family or civil law experience sorry ass on Denton County’s residents (her first bench assignment ever) means she's forever immune to consequences no matter how many illegal acts she's proven to have undeniably committed
or how much children suffer – or how long they suffer - as a result.
UNIMAGINABLE AND IN MANY CASES ILLEGAL RULINGS
(1) Have you ever before heard of the winner of a jury trial or bench trial, (and the party who did NOT file the suit and was NOT the party who chose the much more costly jury trial instead of bench) being ordered to pay the losing side's legal fees? (Over $155K, which I cannot come remotely close to paying!)
(2) The jury deemed my ex and me joint managing conservators and chose to NOT designate a primary residence, each being a LEGALLY BINDING decision. Yet corrupt to the core Levonius claims she ruling my ex is to have our son an average of 25 days a months and 2/3 of the summer doesn't constitute her illegally designating a primary residence.
Levovnius went so far with her hatred and addiction to abusing her position that she put in final orders that my son no longer even lives in my county, only lives in his mother’s county (Wise Co.)! Yet fake as can be Christian Levonius actually put in final orders that said order (Wise Co.) and all others honor the jury’s decision for neither parent’s house to be the child’s primary residence! Levonius obviously believes “Thou shall not lie” doesn’t apply to her. Levonius is so damned delusional that she just might think God gave her a free pass to lie all she wants, and just as egregiously as she wishes, regardless of how many children and innocent adults she victimizes or how badly they’re hurt.
IMPORTANT NOTE
For my son's entire life, birth to age 11 (time of trial), I was a 50/50 parent with equal rights across the board -- and my possession time total for his first 11 years was in reality close to 55/45 because of my ex going on dozens of business trips, several gambling trips, and 2 or 3 cruises while 99% of those dates entailed my son staying with me.
TO REITERATE..
After the Levonius heard several people testify what all makes me a good parent (including a teacher and my son’s counselor of 20 months testifying) and hear me speak of my son on the witness stand - and hearing that my ex went 2 2/3 years letting “bad parent me” be her babysitter several hundred days during her possession time because she was away either working or gambling - it was clear as day that the jury was disgusted with my ex shooting for sole custody. Thus I have NO DOUBT that they would have voted for me to designate my son’s primary residence if Levonius had not LIED to them by stating they don’t have to choose a primary.
Contiued from '1' and '2' above
(3) Ever imagine a judge could be so indifferent to a child's well-being as to block a joint managing conservator parent's BASIC right - a psarent who had always had 50/50 custody for 11 years (actually over 50/50) - to be informed if his child were to be hurt at school or was in the hospital gravely ill or injured? As several neighbors and teachers can confirm, my now 12-year-old son and I have since his birth always been very close and I AM a good father. It is absolutely evil - and illegal - that Levonius actually ordered that it's okay for my ex to leave me in the dark if my son is ever badly hurt! She doesn't care one bit how psychologically damaging it will be for my son if he were to be badly hurt at school, rushed to the hospital, neither school nor the hospital call me, and my ex be out of town -- and thus our son wait hours if not a full day to have even one parent comfort him in the hospital! Deranged and depraved Levonius has destroyed the lives of countless kids and now more than ever undeniably poses a clear, present, and grave danger to the psychological and physical safety of every child unfortunate enough to have his or her parents assigned to Levonius.
Crystal Franke-Hildebrandt Levonius
For those of you who know of the LDS child abuse and man-hating scandal covered heavily in the media the last two years, the facts prove Levonius’s level of child cruelty and endangerment, the literally hundreds of children and good dads she has caused to horribly suffer over her 3.5-year reign of terror on the Denton Co. bench, and scamming innocent people out of money via ordering males - even those who WIN the trial - to pay six figures in legal fees = Levonius has proved herself to be every bit as evil as Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt. Levonius and DeRudder should be locked up for life with their fellow morally bankrupt child-destroying and man-hating goons Franke and Hildbrandt, all gour put in the same 6x4 foot cell.
PICKETING SIGNS I CARRIED IN FRONT OF THE DENTON COURTHOUSE ON FOUR DAYS, WITH ONE DAY SOMEONE PICKETING WITH ME:
"Levonius: second to none combination of corruption, family law incompetence, megalomania, idiocy, and child cruelty/endangerment."
"In Levonius's court, as long as you're female it's irrelevant to get caught red-handed exhibiting Munchausen's by proxy to the child's doctor and the custody evaluator." *****See details below..
Levonius issues rulings based on how her puppeteers in Austin direct her to rule, such as Paxton ordering her to throw out the 71% voter approved proposition to deprioritize marijuana criminalization in Denton proper. The GOP purports being staunchly in favor of local rule (county, city), not Austin or DC rule! The Denton County GOP has no excuse for not yet doing one damned thing to rid OUR COUNTY of stage 4 cancer Levonius!
***To those who disgrace themselves by supporting child-destroyer Levonius..
For those who promote morally bankrupt psycho Levonius as being "so wonderful" for the so-called great work she did for 7-8 years as the ADA in Collin County in charge of crimes against children.. She of course feverishly went after vermin who had sexually assaulted and/or physically abused children because 95% of those she prosecuted were male. Levonius undeniably has an extreme hatred for men.***** I would bet big bucks that in her mind her father and/or stepfather(s) treated her horribly and thus she now "gets even with them" by violating the hell out of countless good fathers' rights -- probably much more so any male who at all looks like and/or sounds like one or more of her dad(s). Regardless of whether my "daddy issues" theory is correct, the already verified criminal facts about Levonius WARRANT she be removed from the bench and incarcerated in a place that has very intensive psychotherapy. The facts prove Levonius is in fact extremely disturbed and habitually commits criminal-level corruption that has greatly hurt and further endangered countless children.
*****Levonius's extreme hatred of men -- EXCEPT apparently when it comes to those who are tall, white, and handsome.
While sitting in Levonius’s courtroom on 4/9/25, I witnessed Levonius with gaga eyes, blushing, and a giant smile - and while the other side's attorneys weren't yet in the courtroom - ask an attorney "What's your ancestry?" That of course translates into "I think you look damned good." The guy, an attorney named something Ferguson, is around age 33, 6'3, quite physically fit, and looks like a GQ model (except he appears to have his neck shaved only once a year). Levonius and Ferguson went on and on about his ancestry with Levonius clearly blushing the entire time. It was nauseating as hell to say the least!
Their banter of course immediately stopped when the first of the other side’s attorneys entered the courtroom. 1
MORE ON LEVONIUS’S HOME-BREWED “LAWS”
As is pointed out in the attached court filing, Levonius many times imposed her self-created "laws" on me and in the process undeniably ignored (VIOLATED) numerous real laws and binding precedent, including UNLAWFULLY stripping me of non-revocable parental rights a jury had just five weeks earlier awarded me. The attached motion also makes clear Levonius is either too arrogant or too incompetent to even respect the Texas Supreme Court's 2013 BINDING decision that child support and legal fees cannot be combined into one monthly payment. She originally ordered me to pay over $2200 a month during a hearing in which chronic liar opposing counsel Lene DeRudder told incompetent and gullible as hell Levonius that it is permissible.
Of course since DeRudder is female and represents a female, Levonius didn’t get mad at all when another hearing was held in which DeRudder was forced to admit she had lied during the previous hearing when she unequivocally told Levonius combining said fees is legal. Combining the fees is illegal for a lot of reasons (illegal per 2013 TX Supreme Court ruling), including that a legal fees judgment is almost always stayed when someone ordered to pay them files an appeal, and my case is on appeal. And anyone who files for bankruptcy (which I have not, as of now anyway) is no longer obligated to pay a legal fees judgment but of course has to continue paying any child support that’s been ordered.
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSES: A) Levonius's overt hatred of any free speech with which she disagrees; B) Levonius being grossly uneducated in the law; C) opposing counsel Lene DeRudder's overt, highly unethical acts that Levonius allowed to occur without consequence (or even any scolding, or feigned scolding by Levonius).
***Levonius is so anti-free speech and so incompetent that she actually claimed in open court the law is such that I don't have the right to EVER in my life go online to join the dozens of others who've criticized opposing counsel Lene DeRudder on lawyer review websites. Yep, Levonius is just that stupid and just that despicably unAmerican. Levonius is just too uneducated in the law to realize that the first obviously disgracefully unconstitutional Texas law (I’m a native Texan) pasted below, 42.07(a)(7), which she confidently read out verbatim in court, only applies to sending direct electronic messages to a “victim," not postings on websites or social media as Levonius claimed. The second gravely disrespectful to every U.S. soldier who’s ever fought for freedom law pasted below, 42.07(a)(8), is the one Levonius could come after me for IF it didn’t have the “unless the communications are made in connection with a matter of public concern” clause. Obviously family law attorney Lene DeRudder (my ex's attorney) or any other attorney (every courtroom attorney is considered an officer of the court) committing the following undeniably highly unethical acts (and many others) when a child’s quality of life is on the line constitutes a matter of great public concern:
1) opposing counsel Lene DeRudder made the patently false claim while I was on the stand that I had threatened a court coordinator.
*The coordinator of course never BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION accused me of threatening him.
2) DeRudder emailed the court coordinator to try to trick him (while it was "OK" to do so because I was pro se and the coordinator was a sub) by claiming a critical motion for which I personally requested a hearing date be set (because I was pro se at the time) had already resulted in a hearing and that she (DeRudder) won – when in FACT no hearing date for that motion had ever once been set, much less hearing already occurred!,
3) DeRudder “discreetly” threatened the coordinator by telling him it would be “improper” to set the "already heard" (NOT HEARD YET) motion for “another” hearing,
4) DeRudder for many, many weeks falsely claimed the illegal as hell indefinite counseling order Levonius imposed on me (without any mental health professional testifying I “need” ANY counseling) “included” that if I don’t show proof of a future counseling session being scheduled (even if I had already provided proof of counseling for the previousweek) by Monday 5pm exchange time then my ex will have the right to, without court approval, withhold our son from me (not exchange him) AND I then until at least trial (two years later) have weekend/supervised custody only!
GOOD OL' BOY NETWORK..
DeRudder obviously used her law firm's (Cowles & Thompson's) BIG TIME Collin County connections to Levonius to commit said despicable illegal acts without any fear of Levonius holding her at all accountable. Levonius actually interrupted DeRudder to say she had read my emails to the coordinator and actually shockingly admitted none was threatening. But did she at all criticize DeRudder for so horribly and knowingly defaming me while I was on the stand? Of course not. Did Levonius warn her fellow Collin Co. morally bankrupt good buddy to not commit further acts of defamation or commit any other type of lie in court? Nope, not even a feigned warning! Whereas if I in open court or elsewhere been caught red-handed knowingly defaming either DeRudder or my ex then Levonius would have no doubt gone into flip mode and most likely found me in contempt of court -- jailed me, imposed a big fine. Levonius’s off the chart levels of sexism and corruption in general and her LONGTIME connection to the higher-ups at opposing counsel's law firm, Cowles & Thompson of Collin Co. (Levonius worked in Collin County for many years up until 2022), doomed me and my son from the beginning!
CONTINUED...
***While I was on the stand being cross-examined by opposing counsel DeRudder, I was able to get in the FACT that she had clear as day put orders in Levonius’s mouth. Despite for 4-5 other topics (such as my son's “hellish” staged bike wreck pic), over which Levonius addressed me while I was on the stand, she had no comment when I stated DeRudder had put orders in her mouth! Obviously because Levonius always gives her fellow female, fellow big time ties to Collin Co., fellow corruption-addicted good buddy Lene DeRudder the freedom to violate the bar's code of ethics AND THE LAW just as often and just as egregiously as she wishes!
Texas Penal Code - PENAL § 42.07. Harassment
<Text of (a) as provided by Acts 2023, 88th Leg., ch. 839 (H.B. 2715).>
(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another, the person:
(1-6 redacted for space)
(7) sends repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend another;
(8) publishes on an Internet website, including a social media platform, repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to cause emotional distress, abuse, or torment to another person, unless the communications are made in connection with a matter of public concern;
LEVONIUS’S LIFELONG RESIDENCE: LA LA LAND
I've dealt with Levonius for over 3 years now (my case randomly transferred from Judge Brody Shanklin’s court). I’ve talked with at least a dozen attorneys about her. The fact is Levonius is well known in the Denton County legal community for being mega-sexist and otherwise biased to the extreme and for being shockingly incompetent. I have very often during hearings seen Levionius frantically get on her computer for 5-12 mins straight (after pausing the hearing.. not during breaks) because she had no clue what wording is in the statutes being brought up by the attorneys! Basic family law knowledge any halfway competent judge would have learned long ago and know by heart. Yet despite so obviously being a mega-corrupt and mega-incompetent GIANT MESS, Levonius actually believes attorneys coming to her courtroom highly respect and admire her to the point they relish "superstar" Levonius pouring praise on them at the end of a case -- even after she just finished unlawfully stripping their client (me) of numerous major rights the attorneys had just fought to obtain during a four-day jury trial! Witnessing her praise my attorneys (Levonius went on for at least five mins) and how much she so stupidly believed the attorneys were thrilled to receive praise from "rock star" her was a highly nauseating experience! Much evidence undeniably verifies habitual criminal Levonius overflows with delusions of grandeur.
The attorneys referred to above, Rick Mitchell and Jeff Stewart, did a fairly decent job during trial (with a few very notable and costly exceptions), but they IN FULL colossally failed me post-trial -- mainly because each refused my plea for them to not go on auto-pilot because my then over two years of learning Levonius is so abnormal compared to the average judge that they CANNOT take anything for granted. Neverthless, the attorneys kept telling me things such as there’s “no way” Levonius is going to take away my jury victory beyond perhaps a tiny bit. Said “no judge” does such a thing due to fearing they could be humiliated on appeal. Due to their going on auto-pilot, my attorneys did absolutely nothing to prepare for the post-trial hearing in which Levonius illegally stole almost all of my jury-awarded rights. Both attorneyswere too lazy and indifferent to even try to think on their feet on how they could at least try to help me and my child (duiring that hearing) fight off Levonius’s insatiable lust to issue numerous blatantly illegal orders! The attorneys did not fight back one bit, even when DeRudder yet again defamed me. Despite that I had the day before given them stats of my ex horrendously violating Levonius’s communication orders literally dozens of times (and violating other orders), my attorneys didn’t bring up any of those facts; they literally didn’t bring up one violation of a court order committed by my ex or in any other way criticize her. PATHETIC!
MORE ON THE ATTACHED MOTION FILED BY MY ATTORNEY
Point '8' of the motion posted below details opposing counsel Lene DeRudder telling Levonius in a hearing (as mentioned above) that it’s permissible to combine child support and legal fees into one massive monthly payment -- despite TX Supreme Court's binding precedent from 2013 stating those fees can never be combined. It is a prime example of Levonius not knowing (or just not caring about?) a fundamentally important, set-in-stone family law that 99.9% of judges have been aware of for many years -- and then further proving just how unprofessional she is by taking opposing counsel’s word for it that “she knows” it’s legal to combine the fees.
MORE ON DERUDDER
Lene DeRudder seems to fully believe every unethical act she’s caught red-handed committing should be seen by everyone as completely acceptable -- even expects me to view her insidious shit as acceptable, never complain at all, despite that her goal was to COMPLETELY TEAR MY SON AND ME APART VIA 15-PLUS 100% DEFAMATORY LIES!
DeRudder has dozens of times made crystal clear she believes repeatedly lying in court and in motions, including threatening to steal my possession time by creating her own “order” that I refused to follow, is something she should be able to do without anyone complaining about it. Sorry, you colossally corrupt, shameless hag – via completely legal means I will if necessary spend a decade fighting your evil, WIDELY advertise proof of your being immoral to the extreme and advertisse proof of your feeling so entitled that you become appalled when any of us mere mortal non-attorneys dares stand up to your evil when fighting to maintain our parental rights!
DeRudder is also undeniably very fond of violating HIPAA to the extreme. She truly has no shame. I would not doubt at all that she’s a full-blown sociopath, but that’s not for me to decide.
TO ANYONE DOUBTING THE VERACITY OF ANY STATEMENT I’VE MADE ON THIS WEBSITE..
To anyone thinking I've gotta be hiding something to have a judge to so badly and so blatantly hurt me and my 12yr old son by overtly and illegally ignoring the findings of a 12-person jury (I won 10-2 and 10 is all it takes) after a full week of trial, please know I have no criminal record and no charges pending, never had a substance abuse problem or ever accused of having one, never had CPS involvement of any sort, and I make a decent living and own a decent house. I am hiding nothing. The below attached motion mentions I go to counseling. I do so because out of touch, grossly incompetent, fully addicted to issuing blatantly illegal orders Levonius ordered me on 8/31/2022 to go to counseling weekly because I OMG sent a picture to my ex of our son having faked a bike accident and texting her words to the effect of "You're right... I'm grossly negligent, took a nap and beforehand told him (our then 9yr old son) he could ride his bike wherever he wanted and a distant neighbor found him like this in his backyard." The picture was clear a
PDF of State Board of Judicial Conduct (SCJC) complaint.
A quick way to verify Levonius is MEGA-corrupt.
PLEASE REMEMBER THAT YOU HAVE TO USE THE SCROLL THING AT THE BOTTOM TO GET FROM ONE PAGE TO ANOTHER.
***This is pretty easy reading because this .pdf consists of only about 5.5 pages (starting on the sixth page) in which Levonius's despicable and often criminal acts are spelled out for the SCJC. The other roughly 12.5 pages consist of only the quoting of state laws that depraved and deranged Levonius flagrantly violated and documentation supporting my complaint.
PDF Viewer
Excellent letter to the Court from the counselor I've seen the last 6.5 months -- she pulls no punches about the illegality of Levonius's order. I have already submitted this to the court but of course Levonius requires a motion and hearing for me while my ex's attorney, Lene DeRudder, who is every bit as unethical as Levonius, often gets her requests accommodated (no hearing needed) by just emaling her fellow female/fellow Collin Co. good buddy Levonius.
***Please remember to use the scroll deal to be able to read all four pages.
Additional documentation supporting SCJC complaint.
Proof of Levonius fully supporting major child endangerment.
Download PDFPDF Viewer -- please review all six pages.
Attorney detailing Levonius's numerous acts of misconduct.
Download PDFPDF Viewer
File coming soon.
Welcome to The child-destroying corruption of Judge Crystal Levonius.
Examples of Levonius's illegal orders overturned on appeal.
Below are a few of the many examples of the 2nd Court of Appeals throwing out blatantly illegal orders issued by hardcore habitual criminal Crystal Levonius.
*GLARING EXAMPLE OF LEVONIUS'S UNPARALLED (AND OVERT AS CAN BE) LEVEL OF SEXISM.
In said case, Levonius clear as day illegally ordered spousal maintenance (to a woman) of $2500 per month for five years ($150,000) despite the woman in court admitting being able to work -- which by clear-cut law means no spousal maintenance is to be awarded. Spousal support in Texas is just about never ordered. 2nd Court of Appeals threw out this blatantly illegal order issued by Crystal "My personal feelings and biases supersede federal and state law anytime I feel so inclined" Levonius.
Levonius approving an extensive injunction that violated a man's basic right to have a trial date set to determine whether the injunction was to remain in effect. 2nd Court threw out the injunction.
Levonius ignoring a defendant's right to have own doctors examine and evaluate the plaintiff's injuries from a golf cart accident. "OK" in a $2 million suit to only have the findings (alleged findings) of plaintiff's (a female, of course) personal doctors presented at trial. 2nd Court of Appeals overturned Levonius's garbage, ordered that defendant's doctors have the right to examine and evaluate the plaintiff.
Levonius illegally giving joint conservator status of child to a stepmother -- in clear violation of state law. 2nd Court of Appeals overruled -- ordered that state law makes clear stepmother has no legal standing and thus no right to spend time with the child other than what the father chooses to allow.
*ANOTHER GLARING EXAMPLE OF LEVONIUS'S UNPARALLED (AND OVERT AS CAN BE) LEVEL OF SEXISM.
Levonius ignored a prenup stating neither side will owe legal fees if a custody battle ever occurs and approved a protective order against the father based on literally no evidence.
Far into the case, the ex-wife and her attorney suddenly claimed the "child's safety was in danger" and that to "protect the child" Levonius has the "right" to ignore said premarital agreement by ordering the man pay $15,000 of the woman's legal fees -- so she could keep affording an attorney "to better protect the child." Levonius pretended both the $15,000 and the protective order were legitimate and legal for her to impose..
*The 2nd Court of Appeals made very clear how they felt about Levonius's illegal orders in this case. Their overturning of Levonius's orders including the following:
".... with respect to the $12,077.50 in fees awarded for work already performed, such retroactive fee-shifting is not authorized by Section 105.001(a)(5). Because we hold that the evidence was insufficient to show that the interim fees in question were necessary to protect the children’s 'safety and welfare,' we need not decide whether the premarital agreement precludes Wife from seeking interim fees under Section 105.001(a)(5). See Tex. R. App. P. 47.1. 9 See Sartain, 2008 WL 920664, at *2; Saxton v. Daggett, 864 S.W.2d 729, 736 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no writ). Section 105.001(a)(5) is concerned with protecting children from existing, imminent threats to their 'safety and welfare,' and retroactively shifting the burden to pay fees for work already performed—and from which the children have already received any benefits—does nothing to guard against present threats. See Saxton, 864 S.W.2d at 736 (recognizing that “the fruits of discovery [that had previously been] accomplished . . . were already available and would in the future promote the safety and welfare of the children to the extent of their power to do so” and that “the extent of that power was not increased by retroactively shifting the cost of that discovery to [relator]”). Thus, the trial court abused its discretion in ordering Husband to pay these fees for work already performed. Though the $15,000 in fees awarded for future work—unlike those awarded for previously-performed work—could at least theoretically have been necessary to protect the children from a current threat to their safety and welfare, Wife failed to show that this was, in fact, the case. Indeed, there is nothing in the record to suggest the existence of an immediate threat to the children’s safety and welfare."
From the 2nd Court of Appeals decision: "After considering and weighing all the record evidence, we conclude that evidence supporting the amount of the trial court’s fraud findings of $6,535.48 and $20,334.06 for the sums Jani paid to Sharma that she did not apply to the mortgage is so weak that the judgment must be set aside and a new trial ordered on the division of the estate. See Jacobs v. Jacobs, 687 S.W.2d 731, 733 (Tex. 1985)."
Levonius stated in oral orders that the man would receive all of his personal retirement benefits: "I awarded [Wife] all of her retirement benefits. I awarded [Husband] all of his retirement benefits. He never gave a number in testimony of what those benefits added up to; however, he said, if he were to take it out now, which there would be a penalty for, but if he took it out now, he would be getting $2,000 a month. And that’s how I considered that." But then four months later (probably after her raging sexism had begun to play a larger and larger role) Levonius signed off on a divorce decree created solely by the woman's attorney that hid the retirement benefits ruling favoring the man -- she only gave him “[a]ll nonretirement benefits arising out of [his] membership in the Local 3 Operating Engineers." 2nd Court threw out Levonius's orders, awarded the man receive all of his retirement benefits, not just 50% the wife's attorney and Levonius had colluded to make part of final written orders.
7th Court of Appeals overturning Levonius yet again believing she has the right to ignore the law. (Case was transferrred to the 7th Court because of full 2nd Court docket).
Unless the law or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide otherwise, a judgment debtor is entitled to supersede a judgment and defer its enforcement while pursuing an appeal.SeeTEX.R.APP.P.24.1;see alsoMiga v. Jensen, 299 S.W.3d 98, 100 (Tex. 2009). The purpose of supersedeasis to preserve the status quo of the matters in litigation as they existed prior to the issuance of the judgment from which an appeal is taken. See, e.g.,Tex. HHS Comm’n v. Sacred Oak Med. Ctr.,LLC, No. 03-21-00136-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 4736, at *14–15 (Tex. App.—Austin June 9, 2021, order); see also Smith v. Texas Farmers Ins.Co., 82 S.W.3d 580, 585 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2002, pet. denied).In this case, the trial court denied Ethan’s request to set a bond. The record before the Court includes an unsigned order that bears the notation, “[t]his order will not be signed. Stay is denied.” The court did not set forth its reasons for the denial and the appellate record does not indicate that a hearing was held. Under Rule 24.4(d), this Court may “remand to the trial court for entry of findings of fact or for the taking of evidence.” Accordingly, this Court remands this matter to the trial court to take evidence and make findings of fact concerning the supersedeas bond. The Court also directs the trial court to file with the Clerk of this Court any other orders relevant to the bond. The trial court is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact or other evidence taken, any other orders relevant to the supersedeas bond, and any other records pertaining to this issue with the Clerk of this Court on or before March 25,2026.Per Curiam.
NEW TOPIC:
A father and his two sons horribly defrauded by Levonius..
Please visit the Facebook page of another father, Mark Loyd, horribly defrauded by sociopath Levonius. https://www.facebook.com/mark.loyd.50 Levonius jailed Mark for a full 60 days (causing him to lose his engineering license) and fined him $10,000 for the “atrocious offense” of using his FREE SPEECH RIGHTS to describe his wife as “trampy” while Levonius fined his wife a whole $200 and gave her no jail time for calling Mark an asshole and other derogatory terms! Mark hasn't seen his kids in many months! The preceding facts prove Crystal Levonius feeds her raging God complex by majorly and ILLEGALLY hurting good people, very much including children, on a very long-term basis for petty as hell crap that any rational, non-prude judge would just respond with "knock it off" and move on! What Levonius has done to Mark and his kids is disgraceful, obviously. And just as disgraceful is the Denton County GOP having done nothing to rid father and child-destroying, nut job and a half, full-blown megalomaniac Levonius from the bench! RINO (Republican in name only) because she’s so openly anti-fathers’ rights to the extreme, legislates from the bench in several other ways as well, and because she always does what her Austin puppeteers want instead of what Denton County’s residents vote for AND NEED (i.e. so majorly favoring Austin’s goons choosing how Denton will be run, marijuana laws and otherwise, instead of Denton County’s residents choosing). The GOP touts itself to be so majorly in favor of fathers' rights being respected by courts, and so majorly against judges legislating from the bench, and so much in favor of local rule (not Austin or DC rule). So why then is there ANY level of support within the Denton County GOP for someone like COLLIN COUNTY'S Crystal Levonius?
I hope the ones of you who read most or all of the facts within this website end up agreeing with me it’s a safe bet soulless malfeasance junkie Levonius would absolutely relish time-traveling to the latter 1930s or early 1940s Germany to be a judge there, get the highest of highs from oppressing good and innocent people just as often and just as horrifically as she wishes without consequence.
Not one more resident of Denton County should ever have a chance of having ANY sort of case presided over by a judge as corrupt and incompetent as Levonius.
More about defamation-addicted, fake orders-creating opposing counsel Lene DeRudder.
Below are a few facts about the FORECLOSURE SUIT filed against opposing counsel LENE DERUDDER and her husband. Facts DeRudder claimed in court were all just a big misunderstanding at the time she successfully lobbied (of course successfully) her good buddy Levonius commit yet another unlawful act on her behalf: order I stop exercising my obvious First Amendment right to disseminate online facts about DeRudder. Levonius actually claimed it was "illegal" for me to online disseminate the exact same facts that numerous others had for YEARS disseminated without anyone claiming it was illegal. Levonius quoted an obvioulsy as hell NOT applicable statute she claimed forever made it illegal for me to state anything negative about DeRudder online. That's an undeniable example of a judge being unAmerican and incompetent to the absolute extreme.
***If all the below FORECLOSURE SUIT against Lene DeRudder and her husband really is just a misunderstanding as DeRudder claims (no illegal or otherwise unethical or even irresponsible act(s) committed by her or her husband), then why hasn't the "greatest and most feared attorney ever," Lene DeRudder, or any of her 20-plus colleagues at Levonius's favorite law firm, Cowles & Thompson, forced any of the websites disseminating the below-detailed foreclosure suit to cease and desist publishing that "totally inaccurate" information?
DeRudder repeatedly hounded me for things she alleged occurred in 2019 or earlier (almost always usually lies or gross exaggerations she and/or her client concocted). So you're damned right I have no problem with disseminating the below 2019 information and ANY OTHER FACTS (not lies or gross exaggerations) I WISH about "Fabricate any orders I wish and knowingly defame any litigant in I want" DeRudder and her husband. She PERSONALLY defame me in open court by claiming I had threatened a court coordinator, not relay defamation relayed to her by my ex (not in that instance anyway).
DeRudder's savior, Levonius, two times proved herself too incompetent to realize 42.07(a)(7) does not apply to website and blog posts but rather only direct messages to the so-called victim. She actually one time read out the entire statute without realizing it so damned obviously did not apply to the situation at hand. UnAmerican and extremely proud of it Levonius can go straight to hell if she tries to make 42.07(a)(8) "applicable" to me because that statute gives people the right to disseminate on websites and blogs "annoying" facts about someone anytime the issue is connected to a matter of public concern. And it's obviously a matter of public concern when an officer of the court (which any courtroom attorney, DeRudder and otherwise, by definition is) puts orders in a judge's mouth to use as a tool to DIRECTLY threaten me or anyone else with stripping our kid away from us or knowingly defames in open court an opposing litigant -- or claims to a court coordinator that a hearing that in fact had never once been scheduled had already occurred and she won, and it would be quote "improper" (i.e. veiled threat) for him to schedule it "again."
Texas Penal Code - PENAL § 42.07. Harassment
<Text of (a) as provided by Acts 2023, 88th Leg., ch. 839 (H.B. 2715).>
(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another, the person:
(1-6 redacted for space)
(7) sends repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend another;
(8) publishes on an Internet website, including a social media platform, repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to cause emotional distress, abuse, or torment to another person, unless the communications are made in connection with a matter of public concern;
Docket Plaintiff's Original Petition (OCA) $308.00; Comments: Application for Foreclosure Under Tex. R. Civ. Proc. 736
Plaintiff
Twin Creeks Community Association, Inc.
Defendants
Alley-Derudder, Lene
Any and All Occupants
DeRudder, John A.
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorney
Jason R Reed
Court Documents
Court documents are not available for this case.
Docket Entries
04/17/2019
Docket Mailed; Comments: Notice and Order of Nonsuit
04/16/2019
Disposition Dispositions-: Comments: Order on Nonsuit
04/16/2019
Docket Order on Nonsuit
04/03/2019
Disposition Dispositions-: Comments: Notice of Nonsuit
04/03/2019
Docket Notice of Nonsuit
03/29/2019
Docket Service Return; Comments: Citation - Any and All Occupants
03/29/2019
Docket Service Return; Comments: Citation - John A DeRudder
03/25/2019
Financial Summary-: Party Type: Plaintiff, Charges: $322.00, Payments: $322.00, Balance:$0.00; Transactions: Amount: ($322.00); Payor: Twin Creeks Community Association, Inc.; Receipt: Receipt # DC-08044-2019; Description: Payment
03/25/2019
Financial Summary-: Party Type: Plaintiff, Charges: $322.00, Payments: $322.00, Balance:$0.00; Transactions: Amount: $322.00; Description: Transaction Assessment
03/25/2019
Docket Citation
03/25/2019
Docket Request for Citation $8.00; Comments: x3
03/22/2019
*****The below posting is new as of 9/4/2025*****
A few more ways Lene Rudder proves herself pathetic.
***VERY BIZARRE, QUITE POSSIBLY UNHEARD OF OBJECTION FILED BY DERUDDER***
DeRudder, at probably an expense of at least $800 to my ex, actually filed an objection over the appellate court (2ndCourt of Appeals in Ft Worth) recently just suggesting (in a one-page 8/20/2025 informal letter) we try mediation to see if that can end this madness. DeRudder of course used her objection to take several shots (completely off-topic, of course) at me via several attachments containing my “wrongdoing.” Too bad for Lene that I realize an appellate court – who regularly hears high profile murder and white-collar crime cases – almost surely does not have the time or the will to review a family law, obvious non-emergency objection to an informal suggestion they made – because obviously the Court has no ruling to make or anything else to decide. I could be wrong, but I wouldn’t doubt the Court has never before witnessed an attorney be “so brilliant” as to object to an informal suggestion of theirs -- one the justices made crystal clear was/is just a suggestion.
***CONTINUED..
DeRudder’s laughable objection was/is obviously an attempt to bait me into contacting her and/or my ex to convey not so nice things in protest of the unrelated garbage she attached to the objection. She failed. Though she did succeed in giving further weight to the fact she and my ex pompously violated the lower court’s STANDARD ORDER (order issued by the judge who preceded Levonius) to attend mediation. Of course when made aware of the violation, sexist to the extreme Levonius had no problem with the contempt of court committed by my ex – just threw out the order. I seriously doubt many family law litigants are allowed to go YEARS violating a STANDARD ORDER that greatly helps courts not be so packed with litigants.
***CONTINUED..
The question is did DeRudder milk the $800 or so out of my ex by filing said laughable objection that does nothing but prove each is litigious to the extreme and give more weight to my ex inexcusably violating the lower Court’s ORDER to attend mediation, OR did my ex push DeRudder to file the “brilliant” objection? Either way, it’s quite humorous to me.
***DERUDDER INEXPLICABLY NOT TAKING THE OPPORTUNITY TO OFFICIALLY CHANGE THE DISTRICT COURT (DENTON COURT) TRIAL FROM JURY TO BENCH***.
It’s also quite humorous as well as very satisfying to me that DeRudder answered “No” when one of my former attorneys in 2023 very foolishly offered (officially offered) to change the district court trial from jury to bench. That “No” answer from DeRudder had to have enraged my ex and still enrage her – because if DeRudder had agreed to change the trial to bench it would have been so very easy for Levonius to almost surely get away scot-free with being just as openly biased and otherwise behave just as illegally as she wished, no “pesky” family laws to worry about that clearly spell out that it’s ILLEGAL for a judge to contravene a jury’s binding decisions. In other words, had DeRudder not so foolishly refused to change the trial from jury to bench then my filing an appeal would have almost surely been pointless. Now Levonius’s literally 15-plus undeniably illegal orders (and other corrupt and bizarre as hell acts) will be scrutinized and the big win Levonius so obviously illegally handed my ex is in real jeopardy of being overturned. If DeRudder had accepted my former attorney’s offer to change the trial from bench to jury then with Levonius’s raging sexism and unparalleled addiction to violating real laws by imposing her own “laws” and having NO desire to do what’s right for any child of a male litigant she hates, Levonius would have very likely handed my ex sole custody and allowed her to move off with our son to wherever she wished (right now we’ve been ten miles apart for eight years).
***THOUGHTS***
I think even DeRudder realizes the level of judicial misconduct committed in my case is nothing short of extreme (jaw-dropping) in both number of blatantly corrupt acts and overall level of egregiousness. Because of other rulings the 2nd Court has made, such as ruling in Aug 2019 that an anti-free speech Texas law is obviously unconstitutional, I am confident they will honorably and otherwise ethically adjudicate the appeal – which of course is all I and my new attorney are asking and of course what DeRudder and my ex so much hate the thought of.
*****OBVIOIUS REASONS IT WAS SO VERY STUPID OF DERUDDER TO DESPICABLY SHOOT FOR MY EX TO HAVE SOLE CUSTODY*****
Even if my ex wanted it at the time, I’m guessing she’s also still fumes over DeRudder suddenly changing their jury trial plea to sole custody (because they thought I’d have no lawyer at trial) just eight days before trial began. In such situations, the opposing party is by law supposed to be given – if they so request, which we did - at least 30 days to prepare their case to change up their strategy in response to the change of plea. But of course Levonius violated that law as well (trial started eight days after change of plea).
***CONTINUED
As mentioned in another section, my ex shooting for sole custody was something the jury found despicable -- because they had listened to witnesses (neighbor, teacher, my son’s court-appointed counselor) testify to the things that make me a good father, learn how close my son and I are and always have been, and learn I have no addictions and never have, no criminal record, etc, etc. I think more important than anything in regards to what disgusted the jurors was their learning my ex went 2 2/3 years straight leaving our son with “not good” parent me as she worked out of town for 3 to 8 days at a time over and over again for a total of over 330 days over those 2 2/3 years – but then right after she learned she’d no longer be traveling for her job, she filed for a modification in which she FALSELY claimed I’m not a good father, “can’t be trusted” to properly take care of our son. ***During her 2 2/3 years of frequent travel, how many times did my ex ask me (officially or unofficially) to change up our legally-binding agreement to where she would get to decide who our son stayed with when she was out of town during her scheduled time periods of possession instead of I continue unilaterally deciding (it’s called right of first refusal) if he stays with me? ZERO. How many times during those 2 2/3 years did my ex in any way claim I’m not doing a good job of taking care of our son? ZERO. How many times during those 2 2/3 years did she claim I may need a break and ask me to allow a relative of hers to keep our son for a few of the days she was about to be out of town? ONE TIME.
Levonius's raging case of anti-social personality disorder
LEVONIUS AND ASPD
Levonius illegally, unilaterally “diagnosed” (falsely diagnosed) me (because she, my ex, and my ex's lawyer, knew no rea too because Levonius has been on the bench for over fou years but STILL give her the “right” to “prescribe” FOREVER counseling to me. So my diagnosis for Levonius, which I believe is undeniably correct, is that she obviously as hell has a 10 out of 10 case of anti-social personality disorder (ASPD).
CRITERIA TO BE DIAGNOSED AS HAVING ASPD
The below is from the main text of fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), which defines antisocial personality disorder as being characterized by at least three of the following traits (Levonius nails 6 out of 7):
· Failure to conform to social norms and laws, indicated by repeatedly engaging in illegal activities. CHECK (TO INFINITY)
· Deceitfulness, indicated by continuously lying, using aliases, or conning others for personal gain and pleasure. CHECK CHECK CHECK (except the aliases part, obviously)
· Exhibiting impulsivity or failing to plan ahead. CHECK CHECK CHECK
· Irritability and aggressiveness, indicated by repeatedly getting into fights or physically assaulting others. NOT APPLICABLE – THOUGH NO ONE SHOULD BE SURPRISED IF ULTRA-SICKO LEVONIUS BECAME HIGHLY AROUSED IF SHE EVER WITNESSED TWO OR THREE THUGS BEATING ME TO NEAR DEATH WITH BASEBALL BATS WHILE MY YOUNG SON WITNESSED IT ALL.
· Reckless behaviors that disregard the safety of others. CHECK (TO INFINITY)
· Irresponsibility, indicated by repeatedly failing to consistently work or honor financial obligations. This is a CHECK too because Levonius has been on the bench for over four years but STILL several times every week proves herself completely ignorant to as many civil and family laws as the average first-year law student – i.e. perpetually proves she never does a damned thing (fails to consistently work) to improve her very minimal knowledge of the law.
· Lack of remorse after hurting or mistreating another person. CHECK (TO INFINITY)
Reasons why jury trial is your only viable option.
*This section was added on 8/10/2026.
If you’re male and in a custody battle with Levonius as the judge and trial seems at all possible (mediation either not successful or not attempted and ex won't otherwise negotiate rationally), your only viable option is to choose jury trial.
*It only takes one party choosing jury for the case to entail a jury trial -- no exceptions. So don't let your attorney b.s. you into believing something like "Your ex and her attorney will never agree to jury."
If you’re presently thinking it's "okay" to do a bench trial (Levonius deciding everything) because of assuming her countless unlawful orders issued against men and perpetually denying us fundamental rights is “just how she treats a small percentage of men possessing x traits she hates,” then please read the 2nd Court of Appeals’ overturns (in an above section) of Levonius’s orders to learn they’ve numerous times called Levonius out for having issued blatantly unlawful orders (called out in often very blunt terms, such as “abuse of discretion”). And read so much more documentation on this website that verifies Levonius literally hates the vast majority of men who enter her courtroom. I would be shocked to learn Levonius doesn't see her childhood as having included being horribly treated by her father and/or step-father(s). One can only imagine what a hellish childhood Levonius's SIX kids, FIVE of which are male, had (and some still having) due to having that mentally deranged, sexist to the extreme tyrant as their mother. And one can only imagine just how whipped the coward(s) are who've chosen to marry and have kid)(s) with Levonius. (I don't know how many times she's been married or how many baby daddies there are).
Please don't be duped by your attorney.
If you’re assigned to Levonius’s court, have had the same attorney for at least a couple of months and her or she has officed in Denton Co. for at least six months and trial does seem at least somewhat likely, then please know:
1) your attorney has no doubt learned first-hand and/or from other attorneys that Levonius’s level of bias against men is truly at a colossal level and entails her overtly committing countless patently illegal acts (and illegal non-actions),
2) it is critical for you to asap get another attorney if your present one hasn’t informed you of the obviously dire need for you to choose jury trial.
Any attorney familiar with Levonius’s evil who doesn’t advise every male client assigned to Levonius's court to choose jury trial is without a doubt one of the at least half of family law attorneys who’s only in it for the money – literally does not care how things play out for you and your child(ren), or might actually want you to lose and lose badly (a mountain of irrefutable, very well-documented facts prove it’s impossible to exaggerate the level of corruption in Denton Co.)
Please do not buy your current attorney's b.s. if he or she tries to tell you "The only reason I didn't bring up considering a jury trial is because it's so much more expensive." Yes, trial prep for a jury trial entails quite a few more attorney hours and the trial itself will likely be considerably longer. But what's better, choosing jury trial with a brand new, low hourly rate attorney or else being pro se (representing yourself) and having a real chance to be victorious or at least partially victorious or Levonius deciding everything (bench trial) with a high-dollar attorney milking the hell out of you for what he or she ALREADY KNOWS will be a huge loss for you and your child(ren)?
There's also the fact many family law attorneys, even those practicing for many years, have little or no experience (the latter is quite common) with jury trials -- and thus want to stick with what they know, fear what 12 strangers and their client might disseminate regarding his or her (the attorney's) performance during a jury trial. It is very important that you either record every talk (phone and in person) you have with your attorney, or at least take good notes, so you can later research each claim he or she makes to learn which are truthful, which are exaggerated to one degree or another, and which constitute a lie. A huge percentage of attorneys count on each of their non-attorney clients being and staying ignorant of numerous laws, rules, and precedent applicable and important, if not extremely important, to their case.
It's also critically important (as I found out the hard way) to asap tell any attorney you sign up with that they MUST: 1) get your consent when a meeting of just the attorneys and Levonius (or any judge) in chambers is proposed and can be rejected by one or both sides, 2) if a meeting in chambers ever does occur, make your attorney sign off on that he or she will not agree to anything proposed during the meeting unless he or she comes back to the courtroom and gets your consent. The vast majority of attorneys are sneaky as hell and love to play God by sometimes if not frequently deciding what's allegedly best for you and your kid(s) without your knowledge, much less your input and consent.
Subscribe
Sign up to hear from us.
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.