Levonuis is a mega-corrupt, grossly incompetent, child-destroying monster.
Re: FIRST PICTURE. Please read about the crimes (literally crimes) Levonius has committed against me & other dads - and infinitely worse committed to KNOWINGLY emotionally harm & greatly physically endanger our children - before deciding if that symbol on her forehead is justified. I know it's hard for those on the outside looking in to believe she's as corrupt and otherwise evil as we claim, but the evidence proves we're not lying about or exaggerating one damned thing. Sociopathic Levonius frequently issues orders that literally plain as day violate statute(s) (including the U.S. and Texas Constitutions) and binding precedent.
We're at over three years of Levonius overtly and perpetually committing mega-corrupt acts along with perpetually exhibiting gross incompetence, and yet apparently neither Judge McFarling or Judge Shanklin or any other Denton judge has found enough decency or balls to even anonymously report Levonius's colossal level of judicial misconduct to the media. With multiple children and innocent adults being hurt by Levonius's evil just about EVERY WEEK of about 48 weeks out of EVERY year, the number of people having their lives destroyed by Levonius makes those other judges staying quiet EVERY BIT as despicable as if they were into their fourth year of hiding having witnessed multiple children being murdered! Each such judge staying silent is a cowardly disgrace to every honorable and courageous member of their family, both alive and deceased.
***GREAT WAY FOR YOU TO QUICKLY VERIFY LEVONIUS IS IN FACT OFF THE CHART CORRUPT............
Further down is a .pdf of the SCJC (State Commission on Judicial Conduct) complaint I filed against megalomaniac Levonius. It details FACTS such as Levonius using blackmail (of me) to by proxy recruit third parties to unbeknownst to them be complicit in her crimes and she illegally altering a jury charge to where it allowed them to leave an inherently critical decision unmade despite state law stating the jury and only the jury MUST make the decision in every such jury case, never the judge. Of course habitual criminal Levonius unilaterally made the decision herself because she is in fact morally bankrupt and has a mind so demented that she fully believes - and expects everyone else to believe - it's just fine for her to impose her own "laws" regardless of how many real laws she violates in the process.
Wording of the complaint only consists of 5.5 pages. Rest of the complaint pages consist of: A) the quoting of the statutes Levonius blatantly and horrendously violated at great emotional and financial expense to me and my then 11yr old son, B) more documentation verifying Levonius is addicted to violating the law in order to oppress and damage the hell out of innocent people so as to feed her insatiable God complex. Levonius is the poster child for corruption and incompetence and yet she’s somehow arrogant as hell -- actually believes the Denton County legal community highly respects her when IN FACT they totally disrespect her, see her as being what she so obviously is: a total disgrace due to her outrageous level of bias, believing ALL her stupid as hell assumptions are "totally correct," making obvious illegal rulings left and right, and being an outright laughingstock due to her monumental level of incompetence, especially in family law.
***There is no excuse for Denton County's officials and the Denton County GOP having done absolutely nothing to protect us or our children from the clear and present evil that is Crystal Levonius.
***MORE ON LEVONIUS AND THE COWARDLY CORRUPTION ENABLERS WHO SURROUND HER.
Please see the .pdf's attached below to confirm sociopathic Levonius really does frequently issue orders that literally plain as day violate statute(s) and binding precedent. She truly has no conscience or shame. She is unAmerican to the umpteenth degree.
"The only thing necessary for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing." I actually don't like that quote. Don't like it because regardless of whether the matter is incessant, years-long felony-level judicial corruption that inherently emotionally destroys kids or seeing a neighbor beat his kid, the fact is any man (McFarling, Shanklin, or other) - or any woman - choosing to stay silent while possessing the knowledge and power to alleviate the current suffering of children and/or prevent future suffering is obviously not a good person.
CONTACT INFO
Please contact me, Tom Purcell, at 817-999-9226 or via this website's messaging system if your family or one you know has ever been a victim of Levonius's countless, clear as day acts of child-destroying, criminal-level judicial misconduct. Crimes she has undeniably committed during the over three years her conscienceless and incompetent to the extreme sorry ass has infested the Denton County bench. Yes, blatantly criminal-level, not just “run of the mill” judicial misconduct. (again, see .pdf's below for details). Thank you.
*Two of Levonius's cronies, cowards who remained anonymous, have each already sent me a despicable message (one a not so veiled threat).
LEVONIUS HAVING NO PROBLEM WITH A CHILD BEING SUBJECTED TO THE EVIL THAT IS MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME BY PROXY (subjected for at least eight months!) -- NO PROBLEM AS LONG AS THE PERPETRATOR IS FEMALE.
Defaming the hell out of me is one thing, but when my ex, Michelle Eiland, started up with her defamation of our then 9yr old son it really got to me. First Mrs. Eiland told the custody evaluator that our son quote "twirls his hair, pulling it out" and that "bald spots" were created. (I didn't know that quote was in the evaluation until after the doctor visit I'm about to discuss because the pathetic evaluator didn't bother asking me about the allegation and she waited 14 months to issue a report subsequent to her in-home visits!). Then eight months later my Mrs. Eiland (formerly Michelle Swaner and Michelle Mulford) and I met with our son's then lifelong doctor, Jeffrey Day of Denton, for an hour – and I recorded all of it. Twice during the first 40 minutes of the meeting Mrs. Eiland told Dr. Day that our son pulls his hair out to the point of creating bald spots! Dr. Day then took our son to another room to examine his scalp. He came back saying he sees no evidence of any hair-pulling, no broken hairs or anything. At that point compulsive liar Michelle Eiland actually told Dr. Day, quote: "I didn't say he pulls it, he twirls it; that's his new twitch." Mrs. Eiland just can't stop herself from lying, even when the lies are so obviously lies! And how the hell could she think anyone, doctor or otherwise, would go along with her trichotillomania* narrative when she had no pics or video of any hair-pulling or any hair being missing?
*From the Merck (pharmaceutical co.) manual: Trichotillomania is characterized by recurrent pulling out of one's hair resulting in hair loss.
**My ex undeniably and repeatedly committed Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy, which by definition is child abuse -- yet Levonius has no problem with that fact (see proof of that further down in this top page). Mayo Clinic’s definition for Munchausen’s by proxy: "Factitious disorder imposed on another, previously called Munchausen syndrome by proxy, is when someone falsely claims that another person has physical or mental symptoms of illness or causes injury or disease in another person to deceive others."
My ex is who called for the meeting with Dr. Day, who was at that time the official tiebreaker per standing orders. He was to decide if our son “needed” counseling. Mrs. Eiland was devastated when his answer was “No.” Mrs. Eiland attempted to deceive Dr. Day in a FAILED effort to get him to give a "Yes" vote for our son to see a therapist (against my wishes) so that she (Mrs. Eiland) could feed lies to yet another person who would be important at trial. Depraved Michelle Eiland would have relished our son being tormented over and over by a therapist as he or she tried to get our son to falsely confess to pulling his hair out! My son has never pulled his hair, much less pulled it out! Mrs. Eiland's end goal of course was to claim our son’s in reality 100% never existed psychological condition was due to the “high level of stress at his dad’s house.” Mrs. EIland is nothing shorty of depraved.
No one should have any doubt that Michelle Eiland would have forced powerful prescription drugs with horrible side effects down our son’s throat if she would have gotten an MD to buy her “he pulls his hair out, sometimes makes bald spots” DISGUSTING lies and he or she believe such prescription(s) are the way to help our child "overcome" the hair-pulling he in reality has never once exhibited. Again, the TRUTH is my son has never pulled his hair, much less pulled it out!
***2nd pic above:
shows the results of this website's first two months of existence (4/12 - 6/12/2025): 1001 unique site visitors.
Not all that great, but not too bad and definitely a lot more than Levonius was guessing. And the momentum has kept up the same pace as the first month’s number of viewers was 492. Thank you to everyone who’s viewed my website and suggested to others that they should look at it too!
1001 is definitely several hundred more viewers than Levonius and her goons were expecting. I can just imagine Miss Crystal at some luncheon back in late April (shortly after I launched website and picketed with one other person) and one of her fellow morally bankrupt, oppression-addicted snobs telling her “Oh sweet Crystal dear, it will be alright. Only a few dozen will ever bother reading that ‘nut’s’ website; he will fade away for good in 2-3 months tops. He will not affect your standing or your reputation one little bit.” 1001 (actually 1081 as of 6/22/2025) is a lot more than a few dozen, I’m not a nut, I will not be fading away, and Levonius’s crimes and my reporting of them along with my reporting of the facts that prove she’s just as incompetent as she is corrupt (i.e. off the chart incompetent) have made her even more of an outcast amongst her fellow judges and an outright laughingstock amongst the Denton County’s legal community -- per comments several attorneys made to me while I was picketing in front of the Denton courthouse over the course of four days.
How many attorneys gave me anywhere from a little to a lot of encouragement while I was picketing? At least eight. How many were mad about the facts I was disseminating about their “sweet” Crystal? One, a jerk who mumbled his name when I asked him for it and then said “Yes” to my request for a business card -- and then he pretended to not be able to find one! What attorney goes to the courthouse without either his big case on wheels or his wallet having a single business card? I told him “Nice job pretending you don’t have one.” He had no response to that.
***See my former attorney's 6-page filing (.pdf far below in another section) for yet more evidence of just how shockingly and overtly corrupt Levonius is.
*I redacted my former attorney's name from the motion to hopefully reduce the chance of Levonius’s goons retaliating against him or her.
Levonius as an ADA
Because of the numerous highly immoral, blatantly illegal acts Levonius has overtly committed ever since first infesting Denton County's bench over three years ago, I think it’s a safe bet that while she was an ADA in Collin Co. she hid exculpatory evidence. After all, Levonius has such a sociopathic mind that she sees no problem with imprisoning innocent people (has already done so) just to get a power-trip and tell the community she took another “bad guy” off the streets. Levonius has many times over proved her level of corruption and her God complex are at a second to none level.
A month post-jury verdict, Levonius gave my son’s known to be abusive mother
(Munchausen's by proxy) an average of 25 days a month custody, unilaterally make all medical and educational decisions, receive child support -- and despite that I WON the jury trial and my ex was the one who filed the suit (and even though she ignored the order to attend mediation), soulless sexist pig Levonius ordered me to pay over $155,000 in my ex's legal fees! Money I of course don't have! In Levonius's depraved mind, I was to immediately after suit filed give my ex all the possession and other custody rights she wanted, not dare exercise my right to fight back in court. A judge making either side pay legal fees after a custody battle is exceedingly rare (under 4%).
Levonius's megalomania is so extreme that if a 30-0 jury vote were possible and did occur she would NO DOUBT want to spit in the face of each juror if Miss Crystal “definitely knew" they made the "wrong decisions."
Outright atrocities committed by Levonius against another father.
A completely different "page" below (not part of this very long section’s wording) discusses the truly depraved acts Levonius perpetrated against Mark Loyd and his young sons, including 60 days jail time and a $10,000 fine, and 11 months of not seeing his sons! You will be shocked at the level of hell Levonius has put and is putting Mark and his kids through over Mark doing something normal judges find petty. Normal judges: those who aren’t mega-corrupt, or unfathomably incompetent, or mega-delusional, or sexist, or raging with megalomania, or a total prude. Levonius has hundreds of times over proven herself guilty of meeting all six said descriptors to the absolute extreme.
Lene DeRudder
Also below is a "page" I created exclusively for opposing counsel "I'll fabricate any orders I wish to 'justify' my repeatedly threatening to steal someone's child and knowingly defame any opposing litigant I wish in open court" Lene DeRudder. Please note there is also much info on DeRudder on this page.
Judge Crystal Levonius's numerous depraved acts of plain as day judicial misconduct have greatly deprived dozens and dozens of litigants of their most basic of rights* and much more insidiously horrendously damaged the emotional well-being of their children.
Levonius giving my ex an average of 25 days a month possession is obviously illegal as that constitutes Levonius, not the jury, deeming my ex's home the primary residence. As said statute confirms, for EVERY custody battle trial entailing a jury, the jury is to always choose (never the judge choose) the child's primary residence every time the jury first votes for parents to be joint managing conservators (EQUALS), which the jury in my case did!
Levonius's very bad acting..
If you're ever in Levonius’s courtroom (481st Denton) for any reason, please don’t buy into her very bad acting. I’m referring to her trying to seem “so nice and wanting fairness for everyone” when for minutes straight she talks with an obviously feigned calm and “sweet” voice. What she has done in my case and in many other cases, including never doing a single thing upon learning of the numerous unethical, sometimes outright criminal acts committed by the opposing party and opposing counsel during my case (many of which are detailed below), proves Levonius is an openly biased to hell beast who perpetually ignores heinous facts about the opposing (female) litigant (such as undeniably exhibiting Munchausen's by proxy) while literally making up "facts" about the male. In the process Levonius ignores numerous no room for misinterpretation statutes and binding precedent and instead imposes her own “laws” based on her outrageous biases and idiotic opinions and assumptions, many of which are obviously asinine, mega-delusional (obvious to non-psychos anyway).
Levonius shamelessly oozing malfeasance.
She worries little or not at all about being held accountable for any of the gross judicial misconduct she perpetually commits because she fully believes Abbott being the one who dumped (appointed) morally bankrupt, ZERO family law experience Levonius on Denton County’s residents (her first bench assignment ever) means she forever immune to consequences no matter how egregious of acts she's proven to have committed.
***Also below is wording of a few of the picket signs held up just outside the Denton Courthouse in April and May 2025 (4x).
(1) Have you ever before heard of the winner of a jury trial (or bench trial) - the party who did NOT file the suit and was NOT the party who chose the much more costly jury trial instead of bench - being ordered to pay the losing side's legal fees? (Over $155K, which I cannot come remotely close to paying!)
(2) The jury deemed my ex and me joint managing conservators and chose to NOT designate a primary residence, each being a LEGALLY BINDING decision. Yet corrupt to the core Levonius claims she ruling my ex is to have our son an average of 25 days a months doesn't constitute her illegally designating a primary residence. It's illegal because that per statute was/still is the jury's responsibility!
Throughout my son's entire life, birth to age 11 (time of trial), I was a 50/50 parent with equal rights across the board -- and my possession time total for his first 11 years was in reality close to 55/45 because of my ex going on dozens of business trips, several gambling trips, and 2 or 3 cruises while 99% of those dates entailed my son staying with me. The jury voted for me insofar as my ex and I remaining joint managing conservators (not being cruel as hell by voting to give her sole managing conservatorship) and voted for me when declaring no primary residence be designated instead of make my ex's house the primary. Those two issues resulted in the jury voting at least 10-2 in my favor (10 of 12 is all that's needed in family law jury trials).
Just one of the many laws Levonius has egregiously violated at great emotional and financial cost to my son and me:
"105.002(c)(1)(D): "the court may not contravene a jury verdict on the issue of the determination of which joint managing conservator has the exclusive right to designate the child's primary residence."
(3) Also insofar as the issue of Levonius assessing me with over $155,000 in legal fees, in addition to my winning the trial and NOT being the one who filed the suit and NOT being the party who chose the much more expensive jury option instead of bench, another fact proving Levonius ordering me to pay legal fees constitutes a literally UNHEARD OF act of gross judicial misconduct is that I respected the Court's order to attend mediation while my ex refused to abide by the order. Of course overt sexist pig Levonius let my ex completely off the hook for violating the STANDARD custody battle order to attend mediation!
4) Ever imagine a judge could be so indifferent to a child's well-being as to block a joint managing conservator's BASIC right - one who had always had 50/50 custody (actually over 50/50) - to be informed if his child were to be hurt at school or was in the hospital gravely ill or injured? As several neighbors and teachers can confirm, my now 12-year-old son and I have since his birth always been very close and I AM a good father. It is absolutely evil - and illegal - that Levonius actually ordered I be left in the dark if my son is ever badly hurt! She doesn't care one bit how psychologically damaging it will be for my son if he were to be badly hurt at school, rushed to the hospital, neither school nor the hospital call me, and my ex be out of town gambling (as is quite often the case) -- and thus our son wait hours if not a full day to have even one parent comfort him in the hospital! Delusional, mega-corrupt, second to none sexist, second to none God complex-infested Levonius has destroyed the lives of countless kids and now more than ever undeniably poses a clear, present, and grave danger to the psychological and physical safety of every child unfortunate enough to have his or her parents battling it out in her courtroom!
***** A few of the picket signs I carried in front of the Denton County Courthouse on three occasions in April and May2025 are quoted verbatim below.***** I carried them for a total of roughly 4.5 hours on April 9 and Apr 11, and an hour on Apr 26 with the help of another person badly hurt by Levonius's evil. And on the earlier dates I was a spectator in Levonius's SNL skit-like (tiny to the extreme) courtroom for about 90 mins total. :-)
PICKET SIGNS
"Levonius: second to none combination of corruption, family law incompetence, megalomania, idiocy, and child cruelty/endangerment."
"In Levonius's court, as long as you're female it's irrelevant to get caught red-handed exhibiting Munchausen's by proxy to the child's doctor and the custody evaluator." *****See details below..
***Further proof Levonius is a big time RINO and the Denton Co. GOP MUST support another candidate in 2026:
Levonius rules based on how her puppeteers in Austin direct her to rule, such as Paxton ordering her to throw out the 71% voter approved proposition to deprioritize marijuana criminalization in Denton proper. The GOP purports being staunchly in favor of local rule (county, city), not Austin or DC rule! The Denton County GOP has no excuse for not yet doing one damned thing to rid OUR COUNTY of COLLIN COUNTY stage 4 cancer Crystal Levonius!
Proof of Levonius not caring one bit about my son being repeatedly subjected to his sick mother’s Munchausen’s by proxy..
In March of 2023, an attorney of mine filed a TRO app against Mrs. Eiland (it is attached cown below) over numerous things, including the Munchausen’s by proxy, her husband’s heavy drinking, allowing our son to again and again hear his step-grandmother speak of wanting to kill herself, etc, etc. Levonius did not care at all about any of the horrible things my ex and others in her house were putting my then 10yr old son through! There actually was no hearing that day (that I had spent over $25,000 in attorney’s fees on) – Levonius immediately took the attorneys back to chambers where they all stayed for 50 mins! Then Levonius came back and announced nothing would be done! I can only imagine what Levonius would do to me (and should do to me!) if I were caught red-handed committing Munchausen’s by proxy to the great endangerment of my son, or if a CONFIRMED to be heavy drinker lived in my house (heavy per the opposing party’s own daughter!), and/or I caused my son to worry like hell for MONTHS about someone he frequently was allowed around while she spoke of suicide!
***To those who disgrace themselves by supporting child-destroyer Levonius..
For those of you who promote psycho Levonius as being "so wonderful" for the so-called great work she did for 7-8 years as the ADA in Collin County in charge of crimes against children.. She of course feverishly went after vermin who had sexually assaulted and/or physically abused children because 90% of those she prosecuted were male. Levonius undeniably has an extreme hatred for men.***** I would bet big bucks that her father and/or a stepfather in her mind treated her horribly and thus she now "gets even with them" by persecuting the hell out of countless good fathers -- probably much more so any male who at all looks like her dad(s). Regardless of whether my "dads theory" is correct, the already verified facts about Levonius WARRANT she be removed from the bench and incarcerated in a place that has very intensive psychotherapy. The facts prove Levonius is in fact very much like my ex: extremely disturbed, greatly hurtful to children.
*****Levonius's extreme hatred of men EXCEPT apparently when it comes to those who are tall, white, and handsome.
While sitting in Levonius’s courtroom on 4/9/25, I witnessed Levonius with gaga eyes out of the blue (and while the other side's attorneys weren't yet there yet) ask an attorney "What's your ancestry?" Said quote of course translates into "I think you look damned good." The guy, an attorney named something Ferguson, is around age 33, 6'3, quite physically fit, and looks like a GQ model (except that he appears to have his neck shaved only once every other year). Levonius and Ferguson went on and on about his ancestry with Levonius clearly blushing the entire time. It was nauseating as hell to say the least! 51 1/2 going on 64 Levonius proves daily that she lives in la la land 24/7/365. So maybe she thinks she does have a chance with GQ boy Ferguson? She was wearing no wedding on said date. Kudos to Jeff (her husband) if after decades he really has finally found enough self-respect to stop disgracing himself by being perpetually oppressed to hell by conscienceless psycho, sexist to the extreme Crystal. One can only imagine the oppressive and otherwise abusive women (or men, if that's applicable) Levonius's FIVE male children naturally gravitate to as a result of growing up 24/7 witnessing mommy dominate (oppress) the absolute hell out of their dad while no one ever told them that no relationship should EVER entail one partner dominating the other!
As is pointed out in the attached court filing, Levonius time and time again imposed her self-created "laws" on me and in the process undeniably ignored (VIOLATED) numerous real laws and binding precedent, including UNLAWFULLY stripping me of non-revocable parental rights a jury had just five weeks earlier awarded me. The attached motion also makes clear Levonius is either too arrogant or too incompetent to even respect the Texas Supreme Court's 2013 BINDING decision that child support and legal fees cannot be combined into one monthly payment. She originally ordered me to pay over $2200 a month!
***The following discusses: A) Levonius's overt hatred of any free speech with which she doesn't agree; B) Levonius being grossly uneducated in the law; C) opposing counsel Lene DeRudder's overt, highly unethical acts that Levonius allowed to occur without consequence (or even any scolding, or feigned scolding by Levonius).
***Levonius is so anti-free speech that she actually claimed in open court that the law is such that I don't have the right to EVER in my life go online to join the dozens of others who've criticized opposing counsel Lene DeRudder on lawyer review webistes (yes, Levonius is just that despicably unAmerican). You see Levonius is just too uneducated in the law to realize that the first obviously disgracefully unconstitutional Texas law (I’m a native Texan) pasted below, 42.07(a)(7), which she confidently read out verbatim in court as if it's definitely the applicable law, actually only applies to sending direct electronic messages to a “victim," not postings on websites or social media as Levonius claimed. The second gravely disrespectful to every U.S. soldier who’s ever fought for freedom law pasted below, 42.07(a)(8), is the one Levonius could come after me for IF it didn’t have the “unless the communications are made in connection with a matter of public concern” clause. Obviously family law attorney Lene DeRudder (my ex's attorney) or any other attorney (every courtroom attorney is considered an officer of the court) committing the following undeniably highly unethical acts (and many others) when a child’s quality of life is on the line constitutes a matter of great public concern:
1) opposing counsel DeRudder made the patently false claim while I was on the stand that I had threatened a court coordinator*,
2) DeRudder emailed the court coordinator to try to trick him (while it was "OK" to do so because I was pro se and the coordinator was a temporary) by claiming a critical motion for which I personally requested a hearing date be set had already resulted in a hearing and that she (DeRudder) won – when in FACT no hearing date for that motion had ever once been set, much less hearing occurred!,
3) DeRudder “discreetly” threatening the coordinator by telling him it would be “improper” to set the "already heard" motion for “another” hearing,
4) DeRudder for many, many weeks falsely claimed the illegal as hell indefinite counseling order Levonius imposed on me (without any mental health professional testifying I “need” ANY counseling) “included” that if I don’t show proof of a counseling session being scheduled for LATER during a week of my possession (even if I had already provided proof of counseling for the previous week) by Monday 5pm exchange time then my ex will have the right to, without the court’s consent, withhold our son from me (not exchange him) AND I then until at least trial (two years later) have weekend/supervised custody only!
*The coordinator of course never accused me of threatening him.
DeRudder obviously used her law firm's (Cowles & Thompson's) BIG TIME Collin County connection to Levonius to commit said despicable lies without any fear of Levonius holding her at all accountable. Levonius actually interrupted DeRudder to say she had read my emails to the coordinator and she then shockingly admitted none was threatening. But did she at all criticize DeRudder for so horribly and knowingly defaming me while I was on the stand? Of course not. Did Levonius warn her fellow Collin Co. morally bankrupt crony to not commit further acts of defamation or commit any other type of lie in court? Nope, not even a feigned warning! Whereas if I in open court or otherwise been caught red-handed knowingly defaming either DeRudder or my ex, Michelle Eiland, then Levonius would have no doubt gone into flip mode and most likely found me in contempt of court -- jailed me, imposed a big fine! Levonius’s off the chart levels of sexism and corruption in general and her LONGTIME connection to the higher-ups at opposing counsel's law firm, Cowles & Thompson of Collin Co. (Levonius worked in Collin County for many years up until 2022), doomed me and my son from the beginning!
***While I was on the stand being cross-examined by opposing counsel DeRudder, I was able to get in the FACT that she had clear as day put orders in Levonius’s mouth. Despite for 4-5 other topics (such as my son's “hellish” staged bike wreck pic), over which Levonius addressed me while I was on the stand, she had no comment when I stated DeRudder had put orders in her mouth! Obviously because Levonius always gives her fellow female, fellow big time ties to Collin Co.,
fellow corruption-loving good buddy DeRudder the freedom to violate the bar's code of ethics AND THE LAW just as often and just as egregiously as she wishes!
Texas Penal Code - PENAL § 42.07. Harassment
<Text of (a) as provided by Acts 2023, 88th Leg., ch. 839 (H.B. 2715).>
(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another, the person:
(1-6 redacted for space)
(7) sends repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend another;
(8) publishes on an Internet website, including a social media platform, repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to cause emotional distress, abuse, or torment to another person, unless the communications are made in connection with a matter of public concern;
***As far as my "poor" ex probably thinking she has suppression of free speech gold with '(a)(8)' above and can get me charged for "committing a crime," my response is:
1) the few well-documented facts I've posted about her on this website don't come close to meeting the legal definition of "repeated" (if they did then literally about half the adult population under 60 would be guilty of violating '(a)(8)'),
2) because my ex is employed by FiServ and is proved via a recording to have made cruel, inherently very dangerous, patently false claims about her own child's psychological health (which by definition constitutes child abuse) in an effort to attain diabolical goals =
Fiserv, a financial company, has a need and a responsibility to protect every one of its clients and potential clients who at all deal with Michelle Eiland -- because if she'll heinously lie about her own child on multiple occasions, just what all lies "might" she state in an effort to trick FiServ's customers? That question makes clear my dissemination of her sadistic lies to hurt our son and proof thereof constitute spreading information that IS a matter of public concern (see last part of said statute).
***My ex has tricked me out of money. One year she asked me to let her claim our son on taxes even though it was my year to claim him and I at that time paid at least 80% of our son's bills. She said she'd get about a $3000 higher refund and give me half of it. Being the sucker I WAS, I agreed to let her claim him and told her $600 to me, not $1500, would be enough. Well, she got her refund and it was for $147! Then because of being unable to stop herself from lying, her "explanation" for why the refund was $147 instead of "around $3000" is that she "didn't know" past year(s) taxes owed are taken off the top of any refund! She of course has known for decades that that is the IRS's set in stone policy! A few weeks after her "I didn't know that IRS refund rule' obvious as hell lie, I found an IRS letter in my house (that she left with much other trash) spelling out said refund rule! One does desperate things when a great love of gambling takes over one's life for many, many months straight -- numerous trips to Winstar while I was home taking care of our baby AND her two teen daughters, making them dinner, etc. My ex worked in Denton at the time -- would often call me to claim she's working late or else going out for a couple hours with coworkers when in reality - as I found out much later - she was more often than not making the 30-minute drive to Winstar! I learned of the Winstar trips via finding a pile of Winstar ATM receipts in her trash with most being dated on her workdays.
My ex rages with jealousy, see to believe rage. Her frequent trips to Winstar and buying fistfuls of lottery tickets each and every week for months on end became a giant part of her life very shortly after her uncle, Kelly Mulford, hit a Powerball that resulted in he and about 20 coworkers in Iowa walking away with right around $5.5 million each. Even though my ex made a good income, her gambling way, way to excess quickly sank her deep into the red. One result was she taking on a sky-high interest payday loan. Who 100% bailed her out of that debt? ME. Who loaned her $1400 (and gave her six f'ing months to pay it back, no interest) so that when she and her daughters (and half the time our son) moved out of my house they could get a decent rental house - instead of a rathole house or else cram themselves into a small apartment? ME.
Levonius the RINO -- why does the Denton Co. GOP still support her?
Due to her love of unlawfully stripping good fathers of their rights (I've tracked down and spoken with several other dads) and otherwise imposing her sick, sexist to the extreme agenda while not caring how many statutes or how much binding precedent she has to ignore (violate) in the process and otherwise habitually and overtly legislating from the bench, Levonius is undeniably RINO to the core (Republican in name only). RINO because the GOP purports to strongly support fathers' rights and be strongly opposed to judges legislating from the bench. That's why the Denton County GOP must no longer support Levonius in any way!
Levonius's lifelong residence: la la land
I've dealt with Levonius for over 3 years now (my case randomly transferred from Judge Brody Shanklin’s court). I’ve talked with at least a dozen attorneys about her. The fact is Levonius is well known in the Denton County legal community for being mega-sexist and otherwise biased to the extreme and for being a shockingly incompetent. I have very often during hearings seen Levionius frantically get on her computer for 5-12 mins straight (after pausing the hearing.. not during breaks) because she had no clue what wording is in the statutes being brought up by the attorneys! Basic family law knowledge any halfway competent judge would have learned long ago and know by heart. Yet despite so obviously being a mega-corrupt and mega-incompetent GIANT MESS, Levonius actually believes attorneys coming to her courtroom highly respect and admire her to the point they relish "superstar" Levonius pouring praise on them at the end of a case -- even after she just finished unlawfully stripping their client (me) of numerous major rights the attorneys had just fought long and hard to attain during a four-day jury trial! Witnessing her praise my attorneys (Levonius went on for about five mins) and how much she so stupidly believed the attorneys were thrilled to receive it from "rock star" her was a highly nauseating experience! Much evidence undeniably verifies habitual criminal Levonius overflows with delusions of grandeur.
Point '8' of the motion posted below details opposing counsel Lene DeRudder telling Levonius in a hearing that it’s permissible to combine child support and legal fees into one massive monthly payment -- despite TX Supreme Court's binding precedent from 2013 stating those fees can never be combined. It is a prime example of Levonius not knowing (or just not caring about?) a fundamentally important, set-in-stone family law that 99.9% of judges have been aware of for many years -- and then further proving just how unprofessional she is by taking opposing counsel’s word for it that “she knows” it’s legal to combine the fees! Did Levonius react with any disgust with opposing counsel Lene DeRudder after she finally realized DeRudder had lied to her? NOPE – because DeRudder is female, constantly kisses Levonius’s enormous ass, and Levonus has big time connections to multiple big shots at DeRudder's Collin Co. law firm, Cowles & Thompson. Thus in Levonius's courtroom DeRudder literally always has the freedom to commit misconduct just as often and just as egregiously as she wishes without Levonius doing one damned thing (not even feign disapproval). I wouldn't be at all surprised if not a single Cowles & Thompson attorney has lost a case in Levonius's courtroom. ***An attorney told me about one of Cowles & Thompson obviously UNJUSTIFIED wins in Levonius's courtroom already being overturned on appeal!
Lene DeRudder seems to fully believe every unethical act she’s caught red-handed committing should be blown off as completely acceptable (even expects me to view her insidious shit as acceptable, never complain at all). No one ever call her out no matter how egregious or dangerous her unethical as hell actions become; bar card gives her the “right” to inject as many known to be falsehoods into a case as she wishes! The level at which pompous as she is dishonest DeRudder sees her self-value over the value of my life and my son's life is infinite.
To anyone doubting the veracity of any statement I've made on this website..
Before anyone thinks I've gotta be hiding something to have a judge to so badly and so blatantly illegally hurt me and my 12yr old son and judge so overtly and illegally ignore the findings of a 12-person jury (I won 10-2 and 10 is all it takes) after a full week of trial, please know I have no criminal record and no charges pending, never had a substance abuse problem or ever accused of having one, have never had CPS involvement of any sort, and I make a decent living and own a decent house. I am hiding nothing. The below attached motion mentions I go to counseling. I do so because out of touch, grossly incompetent, fully addicted to issuing blatantly illegal orders Levonius ordered me on 8/31/2022 to go to counseling weekly because I OMG sent a picture to my ex of our son having faked a bike accident and texting her words to the effect of "You're right... I'm grossly negligent, took a nap and beforehand told him (our then 9yr old son) he could ride his bike wherever he wanted and a distant neighbor found him like this in his backyard." The picture was clear as day a joke. My ex sat on the picture for EIGHT MONTHS before getting a new attorney (DeRudder) who obviously knew queen of all prudes Levonius is one of the 1 in 1000 who would "find" the picture to be "heinous," so she filed a TRO app over it! Despite Levonius being informed that my ex did NOT call or text me after receiving the picture (i.e. proof my ex instantly knew our son was fine, picture a joke) and had sat on the picture for eight months, Levonius flipped out while I was on the stand. She actually told me, QUOTE "I think you did it [sent the pic] to scare the bejesus out of the mother!" Again, Levonius is out of touch to the absolute extreme. Opposing counsel showed the same "horrible" staged bike wreck pic during the jury trial and all 12 jurors instantly knew it was a joke (as Levonius smirked). Levonius's inability to admit being wrong is so extreme that she probably fully believes her reaction to the picture was completely rational while believing all 12 jurors (including a retired pediatrician, one of the 10 who voted for me) "are totally ignorant" to not see the picture as "highly disturbing" and an "obvious sign of dangerous parenting." I have no doubt that no other judge in the courthouse would give ANY weight to the picture. But Levonius used it to "justify" clearly illegally ordering me to INDEFINITELY attend counseling! The law is crystal clear (I will soon paste the law) -- NO counseling order can be in effect beyond 12 months but Levonius has imposed it on me for 33 months and counting! Currently every other week but for two years every week was ordered. The order is obviously 100% punitive (i.e. she knew there was no legitimate reason for it as Levonius set no goals, no statements from therapist, and not even minimum session time).
The following story was told to me by a family law attorney.
Another dad horrendously cheated by Levonius was one who had overcome a drinking problem for over a year (overcome per testing and his therapist’s testimony). Based on the preceding, he had an attorney ask the court for more visitation than just the one hour (always supervised) a month Levonius originally gave him. The therapist of the man’s two teen daughters testified that they dearly love and miss their dad and that their mother treats them horribly. But the end of the hearing, sexist pig Levonius without explanation left the order at one hour a month! Levonius belongs in prison for decades for the number of lives her second to none levels of dishonor and sexism that have caused so many families, most especially kids, to suffer! I have no doubt that Levonius giving custody to proven to be rotten, highly endangering mothers has already resulted in children being badly hurt by their mother and probably stepdad as well.